Talk:Waterworks (Better Call Saul)

Episode poster
Here is the poster: https://twitter.com/BetterCallSaul/status/1556646411566981120 Dcdiehardfan (talk) 16:36, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Pronouns
I clarified pronoun antecedents because the assumption must be that anyone reading this episode summary hasn't actually seen the episode and doesn't know who "he" is in any given sentence. The plotline is completely different depending on who "he" is in any given sentence. What is the value to the article by reverting these changes? -  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  00:27, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

GA Candidacy
@Bilorv do you think this page would be sufficient to be promoted to GA status? Flowerkiller1692 (talk) 19:32, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * yeah I think this is definitely suitable to be nominated. For the time being, I've upgraded it to B-class as it definitely meets those criteria. — Bilorv ( talk ) 20:19, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
 * @Flowerkiller1692 @Bilorv I'm aware that I'm a little late to the party, but do you think the page is still suitable for a GAN right now? Dcdiehardfan (talk) 19:05, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
 * in my opinion, yes, but you should look carefully through the article and see if you can make any improvements. New rules generally require a GA nominator to have higher authorship than you do at the moment, but if there are no objections then this talk page discussion should be sufficient to nominate. — Bilorv ( talk ) 19:18, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Alright, I personally think the article is pretty good to go all in all. I'll try to see if there can be any more improvements obviously as I go through and try to fix the BCS S6 articles and prep them for GA. With that being said, I shall then entrust @Flowerkiller1692 or @Lilycitrus to start the GAN! Dcdiehardfan (talk) 21:16, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I'll let you guys nominate this. Flowerkiller1692 (talk) 20:25, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * @Flowerkiller1692 I'm not able to as I do not pass the authorship threshold. I also reached out to Lilycitrus about this so hopefully they'll respond to it soon. I think for the sake of time though, it would be better if you had done it as it'll be in GAN status quicker. Dcdiehardfan (talk) 20:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I've never nominated anything before in the past so I wouldn't know how to do it. Flowerkiller1692 (talk) 02:59, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
 * @Bilorv would it be possible if you think you can start the GA review for this page? Flowerkiller1692 (talk) 18:22, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
 * @Flowerkiller1692 All you would have to do is simply just go edit the source of the talk page and insert the necessary text in as per WP:GAI but I guess I'll go ahead and do it. I've examined the rules again and don't really see anything specific about authorship thresholds anyways, just that anyone with a 10% of less contribution to the given article can do an auto reject. With that being said, I'll go forward with it since it seems to be uncontested. -Dcdiehardfan (talk)