Talk:Watson and Crick

Suggestion
How about redirecting this to Watson's article and redirecting Crick and Watson to Crick's article? CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 07:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

mingerss ARE BACK IN TOWN. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.13.152.181 (talk) 20:34, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

I see that deletion or redirection of this page have already been discussed a bit; this article remains very short and I don't see really see it expanding anytime soon. Since "Watson and Crick" refers mainly the work published in the famous Nature paper, wouldn't Molecular structure of Nucleic Acids be the perfect redirect ? It basically contains (or could contain) everything that's currently in the article here. Schutz (talk) 15:31, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree, and I'm going to WP:BB and do it. If there have been previous arguments on this, please link to them here! -- Gaurav (talk) 19:00, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Uh---can we pull the line near the top that reads "STD with sex with his mum and gay homo sex in 1953"? Should read that they cracked the DNA code.Minissa (talk) 06:40, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Done. Don't forget WP:BOLD!--Old Moonraker (talk) 08:07, 4 May 2012 (UTC)