Talk:Wawatam Lighthouse/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: The Most Comfortable Chair (talk · contribs) 09:46, 17 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello. I will be reviewing this. — The Most Comfortable Chair 09:46, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Please take your time in doing the review. I broke my shoulder and had to have surgery. I won' be able to respond to any issues for 3 weeks. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 16:27, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh, that is awful. There is no rush at all and I hope you recover soon. Emailing you. — The Most Comfortable Chair 16:33, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I am ready to receive the review now. Thanks. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 20:38, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , I had been caught up with a few things but it is all sorted now. I'll review this first thing tomorrow. — The Most Comfortable Chair 06:30, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Great. Look forward to the review.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 10:44, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I believe User:7&6=thirteen and User:Bigturtle will participate with me in resolving the issues of the review. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 20:18, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * --> Eager to help out. -- Bigturtle (talk) 22:51, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Lead

 * "Demolition was averted when the Straits of Mackinac municipality" — Using "St. Ignace" would be more precise and in sync with what the prose reads in "History".


 * "octagonal" — Was it "hexagonal" previously (as per the prose in "History")? If so, it could be clarified here as well as in the prose.

History

 * "The current lighthouse was originally" → "The lighthouse was originally".


 * "The lighthouse was originally built in 1998 as an architectural folly at the Monroe Welcome Center on Interstate 75 near Monroe, Michigan." — Should mention that it was built by the Michigan Department of Transportation.


 * Link — "Interstate 75"; "Welcome Center"; "Michigan Department of Transportation"; "St. Ignace".


 * "the location of the small tower," — I would recommend using "structure" or "the lighthouse" instead of "the small tower".


 * "The move, repair and erection cost $50,000" — Does this include the previous $20,000? It could be clarified here.

successive short sentences.
 * "Half was provided by the Michigan Waterways Commission. Small community donations paid the rest." — Could be combined to avoid too many

Wawatam Pier

 * Link — "Straits of Mackinac".


 * "are still visible" — "were visible as of YYYY" should be preferred.


 * " tall wooden statue honoring Chief Wawatam" — "Chief Wawatam" is slightly confusing because that is also the name of the railroad car ferry. Just "Wawatam", as he is referred to in his article, should suffice.

The light today

 * "The light today" — It is best to avoid using "today" wherever possible. Would you consider renaming the sub-section as "Status", "2006–present" or something along those lines?


 * "The new Lighthouse is duly noted on newer navigational charts. The light operates year-round." — I would suggest you merge them.


 * Unlink — "Straits of Mackinac".


 * "150 listed (including historical and now demolished)" — Is it possible to stratify how many of them are still functional?

Final
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Well-written and concise, the article meets the criteria. Thank you to everyone for their work on this topic. — The Most Comfortable Chair 12:14, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Well-written and concise, the article meets the criteria. Thank you to everyone for their work on this topic. — <b style="color:#000000">The Most Comfortable</b> <b style="color:#8A2BE2">Chair</b> 12:14, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Well-written and concise, the article meets the criteria. Thank you to everyone for their work on this topic. — <b style="color:#000000">The Most Comfortable</b> <b style="color:#8A2BE2">Chair</b> 12:14, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Well-written and concise, the article meets the criteria. Thank you to everyone for their work on this topic. — <b style="color:#000000">The Most Comfortable</b> <b style="color:#8A2BE2">Chair</b> 12:14, 14 March 2022 (UTC)