Talk:Way of the Five Pecks of Rice/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hello, I will be reviewing this article. Check back soon for a full review! Good luck! CarpetCrawler (talk) 06:08, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

GA passed

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

VERY well written, excellently sourced, and it definitely looks like a lot of hard work was put into this article. I cannot find any problems with it and thought it was a great read! Well done, and congratulations! CarpetCrawler (talk) 21:43, 27 February 2009 (UTC)