Talk:Wayfarers (role-playing game)


 * Last time this article was posted, it was finally deleted as it fell short concerning independent sources. I've added a third independent source, a review on theRPGsite.com. This seems to meet the concerns of the previous delete discussion. Please see the discussion:.
 * We'll see how it goes, but user submitted content and blogs are rarely considered to be reliable sources. Nuttah (talk) 14:31, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Understood, but in terms of sources, that's about what 90% of the RPG industry is limited to. I think that's at the crux of this issue. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Randommonster (talk • contribs) 15:12, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Update - I have removed the tags, I see that you have added references to three review sites and I can concede that my reservations may arise from a bit of a cultural gap in this respect. Cheers Steipe (talk) 22:03, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I've patrolled the page - but had to add a notability and fansite tags. The IP makes some valid points in the PROD discussion about this representing a paradigm shift - and I sympathize with the issue of blogs vs. print media in this community - but at the very least the reasons why this is considered notable should be described and referenced. If it really is important, then it ought to be possible to document how it is important and what impact it had. Currently the article describes only the game itself at a level of detail that IMO justifies the fansite tag. Whoever wants to fix this article should have a good, hard look at Template_messages/Cleanup - there are more issues here. Good luck.


 * Added a ref indicating the context of the game in terms of retro-clones.