Talk:Wayne Lyman Morse United States Courthouse/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

This is a good piece of work. I've done some additional work on it myself, and I now believe it meets the GA criteria.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * I made a few fixups in these areas.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * I did some cite formatting work.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The major problem here was that the "Design" section including a lot of initial design and construction material that was a repeat of, or better belonged, in the "History" section. I've gone ahead merged/moved that material up.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I am passing the article. Note however that while it was nominated under "Law", I am going to file it as a GA article under "Art and architecture", because it's really more about that. Wasted Time R (talk) 17:30, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I am passing the article. Note however that while it was nominated under "Law", I am going to file it as a GA article under "Art and architecture", because it's really more about that. Wasted Time R (talk) 17:30, 7 March 2009 (UTC)