Talk:Wayne Visser

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) --PhilippPhilipp (talk) 11:29, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

there is no copyright attached to the resume of Mr Visser. That's just what he did in his life. More appropriate question is in regards that I have seen that someone tried to create a page on him before but was deleted as he apparently did not meet your criteria for inclusion. I would beg to disagree. He is at least as important as some of the other CSR experts that have pages on Wikipedia. note that I added a few URLs to support his biography.
 * The copyright is attached to the text, not the factual details. The page that this is copied from clearly says "Copyright © 2012 Wayne Visser. All rights reserved." Phil Bridger (talk) 16:01, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because : 1) the referenced page is under Creative Commons License 2) all content on the page is verifiable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Merlinafrica (talk • contribs) 16:07, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Notable person
A section on theoretical contribution has been added, as well as independent references from credible sources like Fast company magazine and CSR Wire, which demonstrate this person's "notability". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoerikwaggo (talk • contribs) 09:16, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Balance and independence
The page is no longer dominated by main contributor [merlinafrica]. Biographical information is all referenced with credible sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoerikwaggo (talk • contribs) 10:20, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
 * But it still reads as a hagiography rather than an encyclopedia article, so I am adding an NPOV template. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:24, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Presumably you are referring to the 3 referenced quotes from Fast Company (magazine) et al. in the intro piece. These were inserted to help establish notability. I have deleted one of the references to tone down the impression of positive spin. If this is insufficient, I will delete 2 of the 3. There is nothing else I can see in the profile that fits your criticism. Hoerikwaggo (talk) 15:46, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

I moved the praise from the intro to the recognition section, I think it is more appropriate there and might address Phil Bridger's concerns. PhilippPhilipp (talk) 10:04, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

I believe the neutrality of this page has been addressed. All claims are referenced or cited. Please remove the tag.CambridgeCad — Preceding unsigned comment added by CambridgeCad (talk • contribs) 10:03, 26 March 2013 (UTC)