Talk:Wazap!

Conflict of Interest
- This article has been written and submitted by an employee of Wazap, however, to maintain Wikipedia's neutrality and to not use Wikipedia for any marketing purposes, all attempts to maintain factual, qualitative aspects of Wazap have been made.

- If other Wikipedia users can demonstrate that aspects of the Wazap entry are misleading, non-factual or too "markety", that would be a good discussion to have. Community input will strengthen the overall entry.

- There have been no attempts to deceive, modify, cloak or hide the fact that this has been submitted by a Wazap employee. While this is not strictly forbidden by Wikipedia, it absolutely warrants peer-review to maintain neutrality.

JP Sherman 23:44, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion
This article only has 1 small mention of any notability, a single award. No secondary sources, speedy deletion may be more appropriate.Wolvereness 21:03, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Objection to Deletion
Ability to measure notability is subjective in this case. Secondary sources and citations will be added in response to the deletion to further ensure both relevance and notability.

lrprice 17:59, 12 November 2007

With secondary sources and citations, this article will be fine. Without such within a few days, it goes up for WP:AFD. -- Signed by Wolverenesst c 05:34, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Secondary sources have been included and properly referenced. Any further contest on the grounds of 'unverifiable material' is most likely unsubstantiated as legitimate references are now present. Such references may be challenged if nature of content is viewed as unrelated or deemed as not credible. Claims of 'notability' are still subjective in this case as subject matter and content is relevant to both listed sources and 'type' of industry.

lrprice 11:49, 13 November 2007

From what I see, and I'm sure most would agree, it has established notability. -- Signed by Wolverenesst c 04:59, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Change of Business
Wazap has discontinued operation in the English language and now serves only the Japanese market. How should this change in business be reflected in the article? Tgcondor (talk) 19:36, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Extensive Rewrite Needed
Upon further research, the Japanese operation of Wazap was actually founded before any of the other operations (Dec 2003); the date given refers to the debut of the service in Germany. As a matter of fact, the service is still operating in Japan.

I believe that an extensive rewrite is needed to address this bias. I'll edit the article with this in mind. Mannyneps (talk) 09:14, 13 October 2018 (UTC)