Talk:We'll Never Have to Say Goodbye Again/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tim riley (talk · contribs) 13:07, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

For the record, the nominator and I had a talk-page exchange about an earlier version of this article (here). My concerns there have all been addressed, and having compared this article with existing GAs about 1970s singles I am satisfied that it meets the same standard in terms of breadth of coverage, sensible layout and good referencing. More generally, it meets the published GA criteria, and needs no further work, in my view, to qualify for promotion.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Congratulations. One point in passing, and of no relevance to the above review: I think the image used for the Some Things Don't Come Easy article is clearer and better than the similar one you have used for this "We'll Never Have to Say Goodbye Again" article. I merely mention it, and feel free to ignore.  Tim riley  talk    13:07, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Yes, I faded the image slightly from the original, which itself is dark, and a bot resized it to comply with our non-free guidelines. The images are slightly different, with different text, though the picture at Some Things Don't Come Easy is certainly clearer. Seattle (talk) 00:58, 15 January 2015 (UTC)