Talk:We're New Here

Lead edits
79.97.92.28's edits to the lead were uncalled for and unconstructive; the recent arguement of his/her that its about "economy of language" is not a strong one; how minimal should it be? Should the article's lead even mention that it is a remix album? How about just "We're New Here is an album"? Economic enough?) This style of leading in an album article is practically conventional, and the direct crediting of the artists, Smith and Scott-Heron, is sourced in the article, directly regarding billing of the artists. Every albums article is this way for a reason. There was no reason to change it, and it is silly to have to bring something like this up for discussion. Dan56 (talk) 21:29, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Don't be so precious. WP:OWN. 79.97.92.28 (talk) 13:22, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm new here is an album by gil scott-heron. We're new here is a remix of I'm new here, which was performed by jamie xx. It is not a remix album by gil scott-heron and jamie xx, as scott-heron was not involved in the remixing. What is the problem here? 79.97.92.28 (talk) 17:07, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
 * It is cited in the article's body; both were credited. Dan56 (talk) 17:38, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
 * And do not make the change without consensus here first. Dan56 (talk) 17:39, 26 March 2011 (UTC)