Talk:We Are Paintermen/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wetrorave (talk · contribs) 16:08, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Failed "good article" nomination
This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of June 15, 2021, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: yes
 * 2. Verifiable?: yes
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: no
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: yes
 * 5. Stable?: yes
 * 6. Images?: yes

Unfortunately I'll have to ❌ this. At a first look the article seems to small for a GAN. A closer look reveals that there is absolutely no info on any of the album's composition, recording, and artwork, thus being a long way of meeting the 'Broadness' criterion. These sections I've mentioned could use, , and as sources.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far. — Wetrorave (talk) 16:08, 15 June 2021 (UTC)