Talk:We Can Do It!/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 21:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Will review this. Looks good! MathewTownsend (talk) 21:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Review
 * Very nice article. I copy edited a little, mostly for conciseness and removal of repetition, but feel free to revert.

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:
 * B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Provides references to all sources:
 * B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Main aspects are addressed:
 * B. Remains focused:
 * 1) Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * A pass. Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 21:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * A pass. Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 21:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * A pass. Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 21:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * A pass. Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 21:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * A pass. Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 21:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Stellar! Thanks so much for the review. Binksternet (talk) 22:14, 8 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Great article/review! Thanks. Gandydancer (talk) 12:40, 9 February 2012 (UTC)