Talk:We Remain/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: WikiRedactor (talk · contribs) 21:04, 17 June 2014 (UTC)


 * General
 * Three external links to correct.
 * Not generally required for GA, but it would be good to add alternate text for the single cover.
 * Done the first issue. The second issue is optional


 * Infobox and Introduction
 * Can you move the references out of the infobox and introduction? I see that the track length and "perseverance" are already detailed in the body of the article, so those can be moved out of the infobox and introduction as-is. If you make a "Credits and personnel" section at the end of the article, you can move the record label reference into that section.
 * Instead of "few national charts", maybe wording it like "select national charts" would sound a bit more formal.
 * Done the first. The second one, what's wrong with it? I think "a few" is okay


 * Background and release
 * This section can all be merged into a single paragraph, and can be combined with the one-paragraph "Composition" section for a new "Background and composition" section.
 * Could we get a reference for the Lotus release and singles?
 * "iTunes Stores" can be slightly rewritten as "the iTunes Store".
 * There you go


 * Composition
 * Please remove the second wikilink for Ryan Tedder, since he is mentioned only a couple sentences before.
 * Done


 * Could you clarify these "musical similarities"? Are these reviewers referring to its production or songwriting when they draw these comparisons?
 * They just simply compared the song to "Beautiful" but did not mention the production/songwriting, etc...


 * Critical reception
 * "From Idolator website" can be simplified as "from Idolator".
 * "While reviewing The Hunger Games: Catching Fire soundtrack" could be restructured as "While reviewing the soundtrack for The Hunger Games: Catching Fire".
 * Done


 * Release history
 * You might be interested in moving references into their own column at the end of the table. I've been getting into the practice of doing that, but it is just my personal preference and you can leave the table as-is if you would like!
 * Done. And thank you for reviewing the nominee! Simon (talk) 09:14, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

The article is in good shape right now; after these comments are addressed, I'll check back in with any final comments if necessary. WikiRedactor (talk) 22:52, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

I am happy with the revisions made and have no further comments to raise, so I am happy to pass the article. Good work! WikiRedactor (talk) 19:36, 18 June 2014 (UTC)