Talk:Weapons of Mass Deception

NPOV?
This reads as a somewhat biased article. Also, why is it listed under "Political Forgery"?

Isn't this a hoax, or an example of inaccurate statements or controversial issues? I thought this category was for faked documents.

Erm, shouldn't this page at the very least mention that indeed no weapons of mass destruction have been found in Iraq up to this day? --148.197.135.65 10:06, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Misleading Statement
The "500 hundred" claim was irrelevant and misleading. The article is about a satarical commentary, not about the relevance of the Bush Administration's claims. Furthermore, the status of the weapons is highly suspect, and sources within the government are indicating they were abandoned and useless, no part of any stockpile.

I have removed the claim and provided a link to a page dedicated to the subject. --208.41.98.142 19:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Can we get cites to the specific usage of this phrase? The first half of the article as it stands is definitely not NPOV. Lemorgoth 23:41, 15 August 2006 (UTC)Lemorgoth

Made this a disambiguation page instead. --GunnarRene 17:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Article
This page used to be an article:

70.29.210.242 (talk) 09:18, 21 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Instead of being prodded, perhaps it should just be reverted to article form. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 09:18, 21 February 2010 (UTC)