Talk:Weatherchem

This page was flagged as to much like an ad so I have rewritten the page to be more academic. That for the review and I look forward to continuing to improve this page with more links and references. BCTwriter
 * +1 for sounding like an ad(still) - I can't help but feel that the entire 'Products' paragraph can be removed. When I came here, I had enough information about their products from the 'General' paragraph. Unless there's something very notable about their specific products, I vote remove the section. +1 if you agree and I can do work on it. Open for suggestions. 74.74.75.117 (talk) 22:11, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

de-orphan
I attempted to de-orphan this page without success. any recommendations? "Weatherchem" is not referred to in any other articles - to do so would require additional additional content to articles. Thanks Shoesalwaysfit (talk) 20:56, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * It's still an orphan so I restored the tag. I think there's a reasonable question about whether this topic meets the notability standard. WP:ORG.   Will Beback    talk    22:19, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Notability
It seems to me that this business definitely meets the notability criteria. Perhaps the tag preceded the editing that was done to make this read less like an advertisement, but in my opinion the topic receives enough coverage from reliable industry sources to merit a wikipedia page. Any thoughts? Fred.Pendleton (talk) 22:36, 30 March 2012 (UTC)