Talk:Weathering with You/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 18:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I will use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the ✅ tag to state when something is addressed.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures

 * It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
 * It contains copyright infringements -
 * It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include,, or large numbers of , , or similar tags. (See also ). -
 * It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -

Links
, ,
 * Could you had some more details to these sources:
 * Replaced with a better source. The YouTube source and the other twitter source is reliable since they are coming from the official licensors. Thanks. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 14:34, 22 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Could you be a little more consistent in either linking or not linking publishers (I usually just remove wholesale.)


 * ref 87 has Morrissy, Kim (July 24, 2019). "REVIEW: Weathering With You". Anime News Network. Anime News Network. Archived from the original on July 24, 2019. Retrieved July 24, 2019. - Two entries for Anime News Network.
 * . Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 14:01, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Lede

 * is a 2019 Japanese animated romantic fantasy film written - WP:SEAOFBLUE. try something like "is a Japanese animated 2019 romance and fantasy film." or simply remove the last two links as quite regular terms. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:37, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ used the former option. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 17:36, 19 July 2020 (UTC)


 * in its home country, Japan - we've already denoted this. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:37, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 17:36, 19 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Most reviews have given the film a generally positive response. - The film received generally positive reviews. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:37, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * ✅ Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 17:36, 19 July 2020 (UTC)


 * On rating aggregator websites like Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic, the film generally been rated positively by critics. - OTT, we already said this in the sentence prior. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:37, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Changed to On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, the film has a 91% rating, with the critics' consensus saying; it is beautifully animated and narratively engaged. On Metacritic, the film scored 72 out of 100 showing generally favorable reaction. Do you think it's okay? Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 17:50, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Except we don't generally put the actual review scores in prose. On Metacritic, just use the actual words it uses. Otherwise fine. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:44, 20 July 2020 (UTC)


 * criticised the film for being a follow up to Your Name, adding that it depends too much on it - needs a bit better wording. Being a follow up isn't what they are criticising. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:37, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay, used another hook for criticism. Please check. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 17:51, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

General

 * I have no idea if the plot section is accurate. But maybe a couple more wikilinks? Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I copyedited the plot section and expanded it a bit and added more wikilinks too. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 17:57, 21 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Production seems a little flat. Only that it was announced, what the team was. Is there no info on the creation/animation dates or anything? Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * . Please check the second para of the Production section. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 17:30, 20 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Other key roles were filled with returning crew members of Your Name. - might need to explain why this show is important. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hmm, I don't think we should "explain" it in details in this article. But I have added a few things about Your Name in the article. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 17:57, 21 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Your name and Anime Limited are duplicated links. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * duplicate links. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 08:39, 20 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Unlink France, per WP:GEOLAND. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * . Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 08:39, 20 July 2020 (UTC)


 * I don't think you need subsections for adaptations.
 * . Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 08:39, 20 July 2020 (UTC)


 * I've done some copyedits. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:23, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I think I got the most of it. I have also expanded other sections, including characters and adaptions section. Let me know if you have more comments. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 17:57, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

GA Review

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Review meta comments

 * I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have outstanding GA and FA nominations that require reviewing at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these, however it's definitely not mandatory. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)
 * I'm going to go ahead an pass this - I've added some additional fixes for the links to do at your leisure. If you wish to take this any further, I'd recommend less reliance on sources such twitter, youtube and forbes. However, good work on the article, and well done. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 07:06, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I would like to thank you those who contributed to this article, and Japanese wiki editors who helped me indirectly by finding sources, and expanding the article on Japanese Wikipedia. They are the reason I was able to get this article promoted to GA. This article still needs few improvements; I will take a look at them later when I have time. Ainz Ooal Gown (talk) 16:20, 22 July 2020 (UTC)