Talk:Weathervane effect

Too minimal?
Although I was the one that tagged this as CSD, it could actually be a good article. The author just needs to add some references and a bit more detail. Right now, it is too minimal, less than what I consider (but that's not really important) minimal for a stub. An external link and / or citation would help a lot. We might let this one stand a little bit to give the author a chance to beef it up. It's not in the same category as a lot of the CSD I see....

Brian 17:20, 19 June 2006 (UTC)Btball

New version
As

1) Nothing seemed to have been going on here for quite a while

2) It was tagged for improvement or deletion

3) It was grossly inaccurate, both in content and reference content

I took the liberty to rewrite the article.

I also redirected weathercocking to this article.

Effte (talk) 08:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)