Talk:WebFOCUS

Edited to conform to NPOV (facts rather than assertions).

This reads suspiciously like ad copy. Additionally, all of the external links point to the product vendor. It would help if the article had "third party" citations and comparisons to competing products. William (Bill) Bean 13:15, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Editing the advertising out caused incorrect statements
I accept that the Wikipedia editors wanted to reduce the non-NPOV content for this entry, but the edits of April 2008 eliminated any relevant content and, worse, claimed something that was false -- specifically, that WebFOCUS is a language.

I am completely updating this page, noting company claims and industry information with citations. I welcome opportunities to adjust my language to a more neutral POV, but these are the things that make the company what it is, so I would appreciate it if people would contact me (jake_freivald at informationbuilders.com) and have a discussion rather than simply hacking out the meat of the entry.

Thanks! Jdfreivald (talk) 21:13, 26 September 2008 (UTC)