Talk:Webster's Brewery/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ebe123 (talk · contribs) 18:06, 3 December 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments
Please take a look at the last GA nomination. That will get the article fine for GA. So no more, as not all was adressed from the last GA, which was less than 1 month ago, I will be failing this one. At least that a couple references were made in template format. That's a start. Ebe 123 → report on my contribs. 18:06, 3 December 2011 (UTC)