Talk:Wedding of Grover Cleveland and Frances Folsom/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk · contribs) 10:00, 17 December 2022 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Redundant
 * The receptions were received positively by the press preference to "well received"
 * -> She wore no jewelry other than her engagement ring.
 * -> and another for the general public
 * -> Frances wore a gray suit and a gray hat which was lined with velvet, picot ribbons, and ostrich feathers.
 * The guest listing would look more presentable if we split it into two columns
 * The guest listing would look more presentable if we split it into two columns


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Spotchecks done on that one web source; assuming good faith on facts supported by offline sources. However, could I ask you to be consistent with the citation formatting? If you prefer the Harvard citation format, stick with it.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Coverage is broad and doesn't stray off topic
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * It's as neutral as it gets
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images are in the public domain and well captioned
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * These concerns are relatively minor, so putting this on hold is not necessary. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 15:33, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The guest list should already be in two columns. Is it not showing on your display? I know that sidebar templates can interfere with that sometimes. The Bride of the White House is separated from the other citations because otherwise it would require nine duplicated citations. All typographical concerns are now addressed, and I've added links to the sources at archive.org when possible. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 16:04, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Looks good. It's a pass. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 16:19, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Looks good. It's a pass. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 16:19, 17 December 2022 (UTC)