Talk:Weekly Blitz

NPOV and inaccurate
Article makes several outlandish claims without backing up any sources whatsoever, is entirely NPOV and serves merely to promote the subject matter without describing it in a neutral manner. A massive rewrite of the whole thing is needed before it is acceptable. Tec15 (talk) 12:56, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * you placed tags throughout the article, assumingly where you thought the article was "inaccurate." thus the  tag is redundant. please remove the tag. your overeagerness with taggging, both here and at Muslim Zionism instead of actually fixing articles is troublesome. -- brew  crewer  (yada, yada) 13:08, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
 * This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
 * There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
 * It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
 * In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 22:15, 21 July 2013 (UTC)