Talk:Weill Cornell Medicine

Logo
The logo User:Odder has implemented is not correct for digital use -- notice the extra rings around the crest and seal -- it's only for print. Unless a digital logo can be found, I believe the prior version superior and supported by Cornell brand guidelines -- https://cornellbrand.cornell.edu/downloads/cornell-brand-book.pdf. —Eustress 20:15, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I've restored the alternate web logo for now -- the print logo (taken from the magazine) does not go here. Perhaps we can get the default logo in web format from http://weill.cornell.edu/its/web/design/branding/? —Eustress 17:21, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Whatever. odder (talk) 21:58, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia uses representative artwork in our articles, this frequently means we do not use web logos, which may be different in quality, colour scheme, or format, and instead use a more representative logo. We're not bound by usage rules and can use whichever version of a logo is best. I've therefore added back in Odder's image and removed yours, which is now entirely different and in no way representative. Nick (talk) 23:06, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I see your points... I've gone with the original Weill-specific logo, but I've replaced the wordmark with the seal, which is what the lead image of the infobox is supposed to be. —Eustress 15:29, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Human Rights section
I'm frankly not sure that that uncited section is sufficiently notable for inclusion. Tagged but still no refs. --2603:7000:2143:8500:A493:133E:BF54:BA9F (talk) 03:37, 31 December 2021 (UTC)