Talk:Weissenhof Estate

Image copyright problem with Image:S Weissenhof.jpg
The image Image:S Weissenhof.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --22:17, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Working class housing???
weissenhof was not a working class housing project —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.216.89.205 (talk) 13:19, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

World Heritage Site infobox
It is not clear why the World Heritage Site infobox has been used when only two of the buildings on the estate are part of the WHS. It is misleading and gives the impression that the whole estate is a WHS. The UNESCO documentation which describes the component parts of the WHS, specifically says the "Maisons de la Weissenhof-Siedlung" are part of the WHS, not the whole estate.Felixkrater (talk) 22:30, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Indeed. From the Weissenhof Estate Museum's own website "To avoid any misunderstandings: the Weissenhof Estate itself is not included on the World Heritage List." Weissenhof Museum. This completely false claim by Wikipedia that it is a World Heritage site must have been sitting here for years. I will change it to the urban development infobox. 86.56.18.114 (talk) 12:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)