Talk:Welcome to Our Neighborhood/GA4

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

The article seems to have improved somewhat since the last GAN. However a few problems still linger with the article.


 * The article is missing a Production and Recording section. I would like to know where and how the band created this video album, for what reasons, and who produced and edited the video album, etc.
 * I have reorganized the article to have that. Asides from what is in now, I cannot find any references that are reliable. is this ok? Nergaal (talk) 01:59, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not 100% sure if fan sites fits Wikipedia's idea of a reliable source. But I think its okay since it contains useful info. &mdash;Terrence and Phillip 06:14, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Added it. Nergaal (talk) 06:52, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * OpiumofthePeople is a fan site and not genreally considered reliable by Wikipedia's standards. Same goes for Black-goat and various other Slipknot fan sites.  black ngold29  14:26, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * They were used as backup sources. Anyways, I moved them to the external links section. Thanks, Nergaal (talk) 18:41, 18 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I want to know the full content of the video album other than the music videos for Spit It Out and Wait and Bleed. If it was a recorded live performance; what was the track list and what songs were performed in what order. Also what kinds of bonus material does the video album contain?
 * how's now? Nergaal (talk) 04:15, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Better. Looks good. &mdash;Terrence and Phillip 06:14, 18 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Is there anything else for the Reception section? Like reviews from critics, including quotes from the critics expressing their opinion about the video album.
 * nothing reliable in the critics world. Nergaal (talk) 04:15, 18 July 2009 (UTC)


 * The lead could be expanded, summarizing what the video album is.
 * any specifics? Nergaal (talk) 04:36, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Voliminal: Inside the Nine and Disasterpieces leads can be an example, although it does not have to be exactly the same. &mdash;Terrence and Phillip 06:14, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Expanded a bit. How's now? Nergaal (talk) 06:48, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I guess its good enough. &mdash;Terrence and Phillip 18:35, 18 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Fix the external link properly.
 * done


 * Characterized as a band's "home video"; what do they mean as in "home viedo"? Can it be explained or given a citation if it is part of a quote?
 * It is a quote. Nergaal (talk) 01:59, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
 * If its a quote, any reference to who said that? If there's none, then just leave it. &mdash;Terrence and Phillip 06:16, 18 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I think the Chart positions section should be between the Personnel section and the Release history section, per MoS.
 * done

The article seems mostly stable with a minimum of edit wars, a fair amount of in-line citations from sources, and the licensing of the image seems fine by me. I'll put this article on hold for one week for editors to fix any remaining problems. &mdash;Terrence and Phillip 05:59, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

The article seems to now meet the GA criteria.
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

The article is promoted to GA. Great work. :) &mdash;Terrence and Phillip 18:35, 18 July 2009 (UTC)