Talk:Welcome to the Desert of the Real

Overview section is of questionable provenence
It is a plausible review — or more of an epitome with a point of view — of Welcome to the Desert of the Real but it reads like the work of a single editor and indeed, looking back, it remains substantially the same as it was at the time of this article's creation  by User:Mikem1234 on 31 August 2010. Wikipedia book articles are expected to survey the reviews and analyses of citable reliable sources. If Mikem1234 was consulting those for his Overview he neglected to cite them. This ought to be correctable. Blanchette (talk) 05:54, 15 April 2017 (UTC)