Talk:Welder certification

Explanation of revert
Please refer to User_talk:Wizard191 first. It appears that WeldingisFun decided to dump a bunch of his own content into the article, then messaged Wizard191 asking how he could promote his site within the article. Wizard191 replied, quite correctly, that this is not what WP is for, upon which WeldingisFun took his bat and ball and went home, leaving the edit summary "Removed copy written information for not referencing source". Umm, yeah, it was your own information that you put there, WeldingisFun, so you don't have to word it like you just happened to discover your content on the page. Anyway, to make sure that his copyrighted information doesn't remain, I reverted to the last version before he began editing the article. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 14:27, 8 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the clean-up work! Wizard191 (talk) 16:15, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

"In Europe, the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) has adopted the ISO standards on welder qualification (ISO 9606),[7] to replace the old European EN 287 series.[8] Operators of automated welding systems are certified according to EN 1418.[9] In Europe welders are often certified by third party Personnel Certification Bodies, like The Welding Institute (TWI/CSWIP).[10] Welders involved in the manufacture of equipment that falls within the scope of the Pressure Equipment Directive must be approved by a competent third party which may be either a notified body or a third-party organization recognized by a Member State.[11] " That is not correct. The EN codes are valid for use in Europe. The ISO codes are valid for the members of ISO, even the U.S. is member of this organisation. Not sure why they still use the ASME code ond not the ISO codes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buschmann M (talk • contribs) 13:09, 10 February 2020 (UTC)