Talk:Wellard/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ✽ Juniper§ Liege   (TALK)  21:29, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Quick fail criteria assessment
Reviewing the article against the "quick-fail criteria".


 * 1) The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.
 * - the article is well sourced with a wide array of reference material.
 * 1) The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
 * - no obvious NPOV tone to article.
 * 1) There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.
 * - no tags on page.
 * 1) The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
 * - no edit warring over article.
 * 1) The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.
 * - scope of article clear.

Article meets standards set out in the "quick-fail criteria", with no obvious issues or problems evident. Full review will now follow. ✽ Juniper§ Liege   (TALK)  21:32, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Main review

 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose):
 * Well written. Prose is concise and flows. Paragraphs well structured and developed. No fragments or stand-alone sentences.
 * b (MoS):
 * Conforms to manual of style.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references):
 * Well referenced. No broken links. Citation templates correctly formated.
 * b (citations to reliable sources):
 * Citations are to third party publications. References reflect a range of sources.
 * c (OR):
 * No evidence of OR.
 * 1) It is broad in its scope.
 * a (major aspects):
 * Addresses major aspect of article subject matter.
 * b (focused):
 * Remains focused. No digressions.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy:
 * No issues concerning POV evident.
 * 1) It is stable:
 * No edit wars etc.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * Images are properly tagged and justified.
 * b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images are accompanied by contextual captions.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: Pass
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: Pass
 * Pass/Fail: Pass

I was a little dubious this could be done, but have been proved wrong. The article is a well presented, informative piece on a very easily overlooked subject. Congratulations! ✽ Juniper§ Liege   (TALK)  21:52, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for your review, Junipers Liege, it's much appreciated! Frickative  23:11, 13 February 2010 (UTC)