Talk:Wellington Boone

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 one external links on Wellington Boone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080617094726/http://www.wellingtonboone.com:80/about/npac.htm to http://www.wellingtonboone.com/about/npac.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080914072913/http://www.wellingtonboone.com/tfh.htm to http://www.wellingtonboone.com/tfh.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101203042836/http://www.acloserlook.com/9607acl/christianliving_faith/breakingthrough.html to http://www.acloserlook.com/9607acl/christianliving_faith/breakingthrough.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070929141555/http://www.wellingtonboone.com/about/interviews/gaymarriage700club.htm to http://www.wellingtonboone.com/about/interviews/gaymarriage700club.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 18:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 one external links on Wellington Boone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090103174835/http://www.wellingtonboone.com:80/about/foic.htm to http://www.wellingtonboone.com/about/foic.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120712134731/http://gocm.org:80/ to http://gocm.org
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070608094341/http://www.frc.org:80/get.cfm?i=LH06A04 to http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=LH06A04

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 08:11, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wellington Boone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130404162808/https://www.regent.edu/lib/special-collections/home.cfm to http://www.regent.edu/lib/special-collections/home.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:57, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Needs rewrite
I don't know much about this man, so I am not in the position to do it myself, but the majority of this page needs a serious rewrite. The paragraph "Although Bishop Boone is a Black American, people of all races applaud him because he is culturally conscious but not culturally controlled. More than 20 years ago, during a Promise Keepers meeting in Indianapolis that is available on YouTube, he declared before 70,000 mostly White men, "We are one!" Wave after wave of applause and celebration followed his call to unity. His messages on racial unity in America elicit the same response from people of all races today" has no references and is clearly someone giving their own opinion as fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.146.65.182 (talk) 17:27, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I think some of the worst of the puffery has been removed. I note the article is lacking information on his education, who or how he was ordained, when did he become "bishop" etc. --Erp (talk) 05:58, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Dividing up "Views" section
I don't know much about this man or his views, but the existing section seems to be specifically pointing out some of his more controversial viewpoints rather than giving a holistic picture of his opinions. Would it be better to rename it to "Controversial views" and divide the latter list into its own section? KosaqN (talk) 21:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)