Talk:Wells Fargo Building (Philadelphia)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 19:05, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

I aim to post a preliminary review within 48 hours. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:05, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:09, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

My apologies for the delay on this, real life issues. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:37, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Prose is good, I made a few minor copy-edits. Accords with key elements of the MoS.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Statements are well referenced to RS, no evidence of OR.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Thorough with no unnecessary trivia.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * NPOV
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Article is stable
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images licensed and tagged
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * An interesting article. Once again my apologies for the delay in completing the review. I have thoroughly read the article, made a few minor copy-edits and am happy to pass this as worthy of GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:37, 1 July 2011 (UTC)