Talk:Wenhu line

strange route
Why does the route look so inefficient between Zhongshan Junior High and Songshan Airport? – Kaihsu (talk) 22:30, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah: 松山機場站 – Kaihsu (talk) 15:24, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Requested move 16 January 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure).  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   08:24, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

– TRTC had adjust rule to number lines. They have no longer used numbers to label metro lines. For example Line 1 is now Brown line.  John123521  ( Talk - Contib. )  RA  03:38, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Line 1 (Taipei Metro) → Wenhu Line (Taipei Metro)
 * Line 2 (Taipei Metro) → Tamsui-Xinyi Line (Taipei Metro)
 * Line 3 (Taipei Metro) → Songshan-Xindian Line (Taipei Metro)
 * Line 4 (Taipei Metro) → Zhonghe-Xinlu Line (Taipei Metro)
 * Line 5 (Taipei Metro) → Bannan Line (Taipei Metro)
 * Oppose proposal, Support Wenhu Line, Tamsui-Xinyi Line, Songshan-Xindian Line, Zhonghe-Xinlu Line and Bannan Line. Timmyshin (talk) 04:37, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose somewhat per Timmyshin, in that the proposal is over-disambiguating, but use lower-case "line" per various previous RMs (i.e., per WP:NCCAPS, WP:MOSCAPS).  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  13:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose—indeed, please use lowercase "line". Tony   (talk)  13:27, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose John123521's proposal, Support Wenhu Line, Tamsui–Xinyi Line, Songshan–Xindian Line, Zhonghe–Xinlu Line and Bannan Line. Consider MOS:NDASH. Sawol (talk) 13:28, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose but follow Sawol's suggestion instead. Consider downcasing Line as SMcCandlish says, though in these cases it looks to me like they are usually treated as proper names in sources, so cap Line is probably OK, too. Dicklyon (talk) 18:41, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose. Taipei Metro's official website (in both EN & ZH) still shows number identifiers for all lines. Useddenim (talk) 13:49, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose all. No rationale in terms of common names of the lines, there even seems doubt that the official names have changed consistently. Andrewa (talk) 10:01, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose any move until the new names have reached common usage. feminist (talk) 11:11, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.