Talk:Wentworth Memorial Church

Heritage listing
I propose deletion of the entire Heritage listing section. It is an hopeless duplication of other parts of the article. We do not need to be told eight times that the church "is of State significance". Indeed we do not need to be told at all - the fact that it is in the State Heritage Register tells us that.

The Drover's Wife, please point me to any facts in that section which are not already stated in earlier parts of the article.

Rangasyd, do you think the section is needed? &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:27, 23 August 2018 (UTC)


 * It serves as a useful way of establishing why the building is significant, as it does in hundreds if not thousands of other articles. Neither of the other sections go into this in nearly as useful detail. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 21:55, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

"As it does in hundreds if not thousands of other articles". What exactly do you mean? Please quote me even one article that contains such an horrible duplication and stilted style. I repeat my question: please point me to any specific facts in that section which are not already stated in earlier parts of the article. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:51, 25 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Literally, hundreds if not thousands of other articles about Australian heritage buildings use exactly the same style. It's part of a multi-state set. The entire discussion of significance is not stated in earlier parts of the article. I'd say that's pretty important. The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 20:51, 25 August 2018 (UTC)