Talk:Wesley Critz George

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:54, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Proposed for deletion (deleted)
I have deleted the proposal for deletion, having added references from the first of numerous pages concerning W.C. George that result from a search, not at Google, but at Google Scholar. Articles on authors are not deleted from Wikipedia simply because their ideas are distasteful. The financial support for W.C. George and the sources from whom it came need to be added to this article.--Wetman (talk) 18:01, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Just curious, why would the financial support be important for the article, when that's irrelevant in articles of other scholars? 41.151.57.93 (talk) 22:09, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Citations list useful for updating this article and related articles
You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of Anthropology and Human Biology Citations, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human genetics and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library system at a university with an active research program in these issues (and to other academic libraries in the same large metropolitan area) and have been researching these issues from time to time since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by suggesting new sources through comments on that page. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 16:42, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I for one am getting tired of your spam to this list. Noone is using it and noone ever will, you are not even using it yourself.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 17:38, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I actually hear from readers of the source lists fairly regularly both by comments on the lists' talk pages and by comments on my user talk page. I have also seen edits to article text (on a variety of articles) based on sources mentioned in those lists. You have a constitutional right to feel tired about whatever it is that you find tiresome, but I personally find it more tiresome to read Wikipedia and not find any pointers to reliable sources, so I do my best to supply those. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 17:58, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Links to works
should be included in the article as well as a complete bibliography. I found one for now: https://archive.org/details/TheBiologyOfTheRaceProblem1962 --154.69.30.39 (talk) 22:28, 13 November 2014 (UTC)