Talk:West Block Blues

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Adith Balan (talk) 10:11, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because its fake (your reason here) -- G11

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --103.148.21.229 (talk)improper license

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because they are over exaggerating (your reason here) --G11 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.89.216.246 (talk) 11:04, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... It is for self promotion-Shahoodu (talk) 11:09, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Merge Request
I would like to propose the merging of West Block Blues into the support the section of Bengaluru FC. Because of the following reasons :

Mainly the article is too short and can be merged into the clubs support section.

2.Secondly the fan club does not have enough coverge to establish wp:gng. On analysing the sources, two of them are error. Also the sources are covering about the fans of Bengaluru FC in general.

3.The name of the fan club is mentioned only in this source. [] But on going through this I found there is not enough coverage about West Block Blues. Here the majority of the coverage is about the club Bengaluru FC.

4.Dont know how this article overcame 2 AFD discussions. The fan club is independent of Bengaluru FC and I agree with that. But it does not have any sources that satisfies WP:GNG. Out of the 7 sources, 2 of them are showing error [] and [] There is not even a single source that gives enough coverage about the fan club.

In the 2nd AFD discussion, I saw a user voted to keep this article saying there are atleast 3 sources that gives enough coverage about the fan club. But all of them are covering about the whole fans of bengaluru fc, not the west block blues seperately.(One is about a match between India and Guam).So how does it satisfy GNG. So this article must be merged with Bengaluru FC support section.Deb and Govvy .Tell your opinion regarding this. WhiteFalcon1 (talk) 15:03, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * STRONG SUPPORT This should probably be the other way around and this conversation should probably be on Talk:Bengaluru FC, I really don't want to be rude to previous people who wrote on the last one, but I felt there was too much bias and poor judgement. This is still an unnecessary CONTENTFORK and is not independently notable outside of the main subject. Govvy (talk) 16:07, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Support and merge as per nom. I don't think it's notable to have its own article as of now.  ❯❯❯  S A H A   18:08, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Strongly support for the merge : On going through the sources I found the sources cover about the whole fans of Bengaluru FC. No sources cover about this fan club seperately in detail. So it surely fails WP:GNG as of now. Also a GNG tag has been placed by an administrator which has not yet been resolved till now. Shahoodu (talk) 18:37, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Strong support and merge: The current sources fails to establish notability criteria and does not even cover about the fan club atleast in a paragraph. Still wondering how this article survived this much.Indianfootball98 (talk) 02:59, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Support a merge or redirect., in order to avoid accusations of canvassing, you must also inform those who voted in the previous discussions. Deb (talk) 19:43, 11 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Reply to  informed 2 days back-like you said i have informed everyone who were in the previous discussion in their talk page.Thankyou WhiteFalcon1 (talk) 16:01, 14 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Support and merge as per nom. Kinda informative since non-notable. As per decent user contribution of him and other user I support merger. SHISHIR DUA 07:40, 12 October 2020 (UTC)