Talk:West Hendford Cricket Ground/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Relentlessly (talk · contribs) 07:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

This is nearly there, but there are a few things to clear up.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * A few bits of prose read oddly, mainly in the first paragraph of "History". "Yeovil and County Cricket Club were formed" – here I believe you need the singular, as you're referring to a single entity, not a collection of individuals. The same later in the same sentence. "the club was reformed with the lesser remit" – you mean "re-formed", I think You use "the club" several times starting after "The club played at West Hendford" but you are referring to two different clubs. This is quite confusing. Pet peeve: "from 17–19 August" really ought to be "from 17 to 19 August". Final paragraph of "History": "The final first-class match was played on the ground" should be "The final first-class match on the ground was played".
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Reference 26 is broken
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * You're understandably a little uncertain about the non-free use rationale, but I think it's valid.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * On hold for 7 days to address the above issues. Relentlessly (talk) 07:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review . I've had a run through the article, and I think your comments have all been addressed. Harrias talk 11:20, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Modifications look good. Pass. Relentlessly (talk) 13:16, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * On hold for 7 days to address the above issues. Relentlessly (talk) 07:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review . I've had a run through the article, and I think your comments have all been addressed. Harrias talk 11:20, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Modifications look good. Pass. Relentlessly (talk) 13:16, 30 March 2015 (UTC)