Talk:West Virginia glyphs

It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with Barry Fell.
I concur, for it is not the consensus of our state's scientists. This is viewed as pseudo-science locally by our scholars, yet, it is open to further conjecture or better said, study. This article has little local scholastic treatment within the text and could be mis-leading the public of local views about these. This article does example popular speculation of that time, though. Hence, It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with Barry Fell and a broader-text article with other scholar's, especially our scientist's, interpretation should be included. A few of these glyphs are identifiable other than the text within states. Conaughy (talk) 01:13, 18 August 2008 (UTC)