Talk:Western University of Health Sciences

updated stats and corrections
I work in the Public Affairs office of Western University of Health Sciences. In reviewing this page, I noticed there are some areas that need updating. I am new to Wikipedia (at least the editing part of it) and I want to ensure I do not violate conflict of interest guidelines.

I have two suggested updates/corrections.

Under History in the final paragraph:

The Chronicle of Higher Education named WesternU as a great college to work for every year from 2012 through 2016 2017, and has been on the Honor Roll for four years.[26][27][28][29]

Citation:

Under Campus (sixth paragraph): The western range of campus contains the Weinberg Rodney P. Wineberg Center, home to research administration and laboratories, in addition to the Pumerantz Library, and Anderson Tower (formerly known as the Chase Bank building). The Weinberg Wineberg Center contains 8,550 square feet dedicated to research.[68] The Weinberg Wineberg Center building was originally a JCPenney.[32]

Citation (for the correct spelling):

Thank you for your consideration.

Westernuwriter (talk) 00:13, 26 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your suggestions on how to improve the article; I have updated the article accordingly.  If you ever have any questions, don't hesitate to reach out.  Rytyho usa (talk) 00:27, 26 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Marking as answered. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 04:59, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring to remove information about no confidence vote in the president
An unregistered editor is edit warring to (a) remove information about a no confidence vote in the university's president and (b) place it in the middle of the history section, out of chronological order. Why would we mention a vote of no confidence and not include any information about why it took place? And why would we stick in the middle of the history section, out of order? ElKevbo (talk) 23:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree this content belongs at the end of the history section (as the article is currently written), since this would adhere to the current organization of chronological ordering of events (makes sense for a history section). While I do not see that vagueness or ambiguity is an issue with the move, I also see no reason why it should be moved to the middle of the history section. If the IP user feels that additional information from the cited source should be included in the article, I would encourage them expand the article accordingly. Rytyho usa (talk) 18:32, 10 October 2020 (UTC)