Talk:Westminster Larger Catechism

Wikisource
Would this not be Wikisource? -- user:zanimum


 * No :)


 * Seriously, this definitely doesn't belong in Wikipedia, it might be suitable for Wikisource. --Robert Merkel 12:30, 5 May 2004 (UTC)


 * First time I've heard of Wikisource! I'm checking it as I type... I suppose it probably is a borderline Wikisource, except that it is not as long as the ones I've just scanned. I just thought that it would be good to have the actual source material in the encyclopaedia entry. I've done the same with Westminster Shorter Catechism and Thirty-Nine Articles. What is the policy with this? One Salient Oversight 12:37, 5 May 2004 (UTC)


 * I see that Robert M has deleted most of the article. Oh well. Should I also delete the primary source material in the Shorter Catechism and the 39 articles RObert? One Salient Oversight 12:49, 5 May 2004 (UTC)


 * Yes. don't include copies of primary sources. However, it would be really good if you could add to the Wikipedia  articles explaining what these documents are, how they were written, how they have influenced things since, and so on.

--Robert Merkel 12:53, 5 May 2004 (UTC)

Will do. Thanks for your help Robert. One Salient Oversight 12:55, 5 May 2004 (UTC)

So has it been included on Wikisource? -- user:zanimum

I just added it to Wikisource. -- Rich Blinne 30 November 2004,   20:53 (UTC)