Talk:Wet (Nicole Scherzinger song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 01:10, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

I will review. I tend to make minor fixes myself instead of bothering to tell you to do it. If you are unhappy with any changes I make feel free to revert them and we will instead discuss the issue. Also please be advised this is my first GA review for an article about a song; it may be a bit of a learning curve for me. Freikorp (talk) 01:10, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm passing this now. Article was very well written and layed out. I made many small changes and fixes while the nomination was open; you can see the majority of them here: . Well done. Freikorp (talk) 04:26, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * I stopped checking for close paraprhasing/copyright violations after the first column of references as there were no signs of any.
 * The only thing i'm still unsure of is the lead sentence "The dance-pop and pop song speak of Scherzinger singing that her body is aching for a man's touch." I don't think it's appropriate. "Aching for a man's touch" is a direct quote from one source only. Suggest complete rewording, or somehow attribute the words as a direct quote. I'm unsure of the best way to do this, so i'm going to leave it with you.


 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * Current ref 15 (UK Singles Chart) links to the current chart, not an archive featuring this song. Accordingly it doesn't back up the assertion.
 * Also searching for 'Nicole Scherzinger' at said website indicates the song peaked at No. 21 in the UK, contradicting the article.
 * Alex talk page! 03:41, 21 December 2014 (UTC)


 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * No ongoing disputes since 2011, and that one has long been resolved.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: