Talk:What's The Harm?

Untitled
A few issues have been brought up about this article that I would like discuss WikiDudeia (talk) 12:59, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Notability
Whatstheharm.net has a PageRank of 5 and has more than thirty eight thousand external links pointing to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiDudeia (talk • contribs) 14:59, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

neutral point of view
I would like to hear suggestions about this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiDudeia (talk • contribs) 14:59, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest
I know the site author. The reason I created the entry however, was not out of loyalty or favoritism. I added the article because I began to hear about it in a variety of places (blogs, podcasts, mainstream websites, celebrity vidcasts and at conferences) and couldn't find it in wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiDudeia (talk • contribs) 15:00, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I know him also and that seems a shame if we can't work on this page because we personally know him. So I think as long as we are neutral there won't be a problem. The site is noteworthy that is for sure.  SGerbic (talk) 00:18, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Advert
I learned of this article by following a link from Susan Gerbic's See also section. It was recently tagged as an advert by another editor. I read the article and agree that it seems promotional. Here are hints on what could be done to improve it. It's overly verbose and could be shorter, focusing on what it is about instead of testimonials. Also, most quotes could be summarized instead of inline quoting (in which case it's also often possible to combine multiple reviews in fewer sentences). If more third party independent sources are available, those are also preferable over the site or founder's. On the other hand, non-self-serving WP:ABOUTSELF is acceptable. — Paleo Neonate  – 04:02, 4 November 2021 (UTC)