Talk:What's Your Raashee?/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 14:46, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

I will review this article. Thank you. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 14:46, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Comments up tonight. Please stand-by. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 10:44, 16 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Lead
 * Looks good. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Plot
 * "She tells him that a boy has agreed to marry her, but she is reluctan" — reluctant. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * "Sanjana shows Devu a picture; when he says something, she becomes angry and tries to leave." — says what? —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Cast
 * The last four do not have role names. Either find out or, at best, remove them. Your call. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Character description
 * Can you include references which describe the traits of Chopra's characters? It would be better for those who may not know about the film. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

More tomorrow. — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 15:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Done. Krish |  Talk  20:29, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * My second comment in the "Plot" section is not addressed yet. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 07:04, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes because that conversation is muted in the film. So, what do you want me to add what he said to her? Krish |  Talk  07:52, 17 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Production
 * In the plot, Harman's character, Yogesh, says he doesn't know his sign but in the casting section, you mention that Yogesh is Scorpio? Quite confusing there. Please clarify. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 08:47, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, Sanjana asks Yogesh what's her raashee is. I think this was altered during the copy-editing. Krish |  Talk  15:49, 18 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Soundtrack
 * "The vocals were performed by Sen, who appears on most of the songs" — Do you mean "renders"/"performs"? If so, either of those two would be better instead of "appears" unless he made an appearance in the song videos. If that is the case, you can list the songs where he makes his appearances in a footnote. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 08:51, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Re-worded. Krish |  Talk  15:49, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll look at the last three sections tomorrow. Really busy in real life. I apologise for the delay in my review. I'm usually never this slow. —  Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 08:53, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Couldn't find any fault with the last three sections. Great job! — Ssven2  Looking at you, kid 14:59, 19 March 2017 (UTC)