Talk:What Is... Cliff Clavin?/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 23:27, 25 June 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Infobox

 * No issues

Lead

 * No issues

Preface

 * An explanation of Jeopardy! is not necessary as separate article explains how it is played
 * Only include information that relates to this episode
 * Must people be forced to go to Jeopardy! article? The preface serves as a purpose for readers who do not have to read more about Jeopardy! --George Ho (talk) 00:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Plot

 * No issues

Reception

 * Combine all information in one paragraph, as it all relates to each other
 * ✅. --George Ho (talk) 00:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Impact

 * No issues

Conclusion
After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address other issues which you believe do not concern good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 ( talk2me ) 23:48, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Since all of the issues have been addressed, I feel confident passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211  ( talk2me ) 03:30, 26 June 2012 (UTC)