Talk:What Is Art?

Is this sufficiently detailed? Is it a good article? I'm new here, and I'm trying to be helpful, so go easy on me, but I'm trying to see if this is good.

Lydgate 22:11, Apr 13, 2004 (UTC)

The sentence in paragraph two which starts out "Tolstoy addition to previously..." seems a little unclear, perhaps just a grammatical mistake or missing a word. I corrected wide to widen and compeling to compelling. My question is that what is art??

u cant know lololol —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.112.113.132 (talk) 01:04, 17 September 2008 (UTC) Art doesnt need to be beatiful

Critical reception?
Apparently the public were greatly disappointed at this work, felt to be unworthy of such a great author. There should be some reference to this. Valetude (talk) 10:16, 10 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Precisely who was apparently (seemingly, ostensibly) greatly disappointed? Who felt it to be apparently unworthy of such a great author? Since we are dealing with subjective points of view, I might add mine: This book by Tolstoy is enormously important and of inestimable value.96.248.101.32 (talk) 19:27, 7 April 2018 (UTC)DeMikeal Bivins

The empty sections
What are these empty sections? Do they correspond to the sections of the book? Valetude (talk) 10:18, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

English
E 41.210.141.129 (talk) 18:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Science 2022
What is blood 45.215.220.123 (talk) 06:00, 29 August 2022 (UTC)