Talk:What More Can I Give/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): The Grammar and spelling are correct, and the prose is clear.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): Not enough references in "Recording"
 * a (references): Not enough references in "Recording"


 * There are no more sources available. Everything in that section is sourced.  Pyrrhus  16 ''' 01:45, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

b (citations to reliable sources):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): it addresses the main aspects of the topic b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * Add link to Spanish language and italicize it
 * Done.


 * Change link form "anti-apartheid" to "anti-apartheid"
 * Done.


 * In "Background and writing," put quote box in for quote at the bottom of the section insert text here
 * The quote is already a blockquote. The above formatting moves the quote to the left side, making the last sentence in the paragraph useless.


 * Do same thing as listed above to "Airplay's" quote.
 * This is in a quotebox and the blockquote formatting doesn't allow for quote attribution to the person that has made the remark.


 * On the "Artists Involved" table, take off question marks
 * Done.


 * Resolution of cover art images should be lowered if possible, they're a bit big.
 * Done Crowz  RSA  21:10, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer: Crowz  RSA  22:52, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your comments thus far. :)  Pyrrhus  16 ''' 00:08, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

This GAN has passed, and this is now a good article! If you found this review helpful, please consider helping out a fellow editor by reviewing another good article nomination. Help and advice on how to do so is available here, and you can ask for the help of a GAN mentor, if you wish.

Congratulations, Crowz  RSA  21:16, 27 January 2010 (UTC)