Talk:What You Want (Evanescence song)

Lyrics
I changed the "bad" reflection into "pale" reflection, since Amy wrote that on the official forum. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dean64 (talk • contribs) 09:13, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Notability
As of now, this song has zero notability and the article content consists only of bulk quotes from a single article (possible copyright violation, even if it IS quoted). This song has not charted, has not yet been released, has no covers, etc. If you wish to slowly create this article, please do so in a User Sandbox until the article can meet Wikipedia's notability standards.  ~ [ Scott M. Howard  ] ~ [  Talk  ]:[  Contribs  ] ~  23:37, 15 July 2011 (UTC)


 * The single is already announced via MTV (a reliable source) and Evanescence's official website (a direct source). Wikipedia's page on Notability of music states "they may be notable if they have significant independent coverage in reliable sources". This single DOES have have significant independent coverage in reliable sources. The United States copyright law states that it is permissible to use quotes "for purposes such as commentary, criticism, news reporting, and scholarly reports. There are no legal rules permitting the use of a specific number of words, a certain number of musical notes, or percentage of a work". Also, information in this article IS presented in a form other than quotes. — ErickAutumn (t @ c), 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * ONE source is not "significant coverage". With that said, the proper quote of WP:NSONG you're looking for is "Most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article, such as for the songwriter, a prominent album or for the artist who prominently performed the song. Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable." (emphasis mine).
 * This song meets none of those qualifications per Song Notability. Simply having it mentioned in ONE source is not grounds to have its own article AT THIS TIME.  The recommendation that the article be developed in SANDBOX (since there STILL is no worthy information even in the article outside directly quoting this ONE source) is the best procedure here before someone comes along and nominates it for deletion (might even be me soon unless some actual content makes its way to this stub), losing all editor attribution.  I'm not getting into an edit war with you, but your reasons for keeping this in article space at the moment are clearly against the guidelines of music notability.  ~ [  Scott M. Howard  ] ~ [  Talk  ]:[  Contribs  ] ~  00:23, 16 July 2011 (UTC)