Talk:Wheel of Fortune (American game show)/Archive 1

Auditions
Someone added this text to the Jeopardy! audition process article; but it should definitely go here instead (if verified).
 * Wheel of Fortune audition process
 * A similar audition process is used for Wheel of Fortune. Instead of taking a 50-question test, potential contestants are given a 16-puzzle test divided into four categories with some letters revealed (similar to the program's bonus round). The contestants have 5 minutes to solve as many puzzles as they can by writing in the correct letters. A passing score is considered to be 12 out of 16 but like Jeopardy!, exact scores are never given. The people who pass stay for a while to compete in a mock version of the game using a miniature wheel and a puzzleboard.

Cheers,--Aervanath (talk) 13:37, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Source: [] This verifies everything but the "A passing score" sentence. JTRH (talk) 14:03, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Added it. Us441(talk)(contribs) 10:54, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Biggest wins and losses on Wheel of Fortune
The page "Biggest wins and losses on Wheel of Fortune" has been moved to "Talk:Wheel of Fortune (U.S. game show)/Biggest wins and losses" in order to preserve history of this article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:34, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

NBC's brief cancellation of the show in 1980
I think the Randy West-sourced statement about the daytime show's brief cancellation in 1980 is incorrect. I've read (but don't remember where just now) that Silverman reversed the decision to cancel it because it was NBC's highest-rated daytime show (or at least game show), not because the decision was made to cut the Letterman show from 90 minutes to 60. The Letterman show was 90 minutes when it premiered, and was cut to an hour after it had been on the air for several weeks. The shows that were cancelled to make room for Letterman (in the 90-minute format) were Card Sharks, Hollywood Squares, and the second NBC version of High Rollers. I can't disprove Randy's statement without more research, so I'm going to leave it for now, but it may be subject to change in the future if I can source it. JTRH (talk) 21:05, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * For the record, while I know this is seven months after the fact, Wheel was poised for cancellation twice in 1980 – while the first was being among the candidates to be ousted for Letterman (an idea dismissed by May), the second was followed through to the point of a series finale being taped for August 1. As I understand it, Silverman realized that Letterman was struggling as a 90-minute series and hence it was chopped down on August 4. (The cancellation announcement was why Charlie O'Donnell was replaced by Jack Clark, as the former left to do another series.) Also, Randy West is/was friends with and has myriad connections in the game show industry – he, Fred Wostbrock, and Roger Dobkowitz are among the most knowledgeable and trustworthy people in the genre. -Daniel Benfield (talk) 03:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Move?

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved -- JHunterJ (talk) 01:11, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Wheel of Fortune (U.S. game show) → Wheel of Fortune (US game show) – Like Wheel of Fortune (UK game show), punctuations for the US may not be necessary. WP:article titles does not either favor or oppose inclusion of punctuations. Nevertheless, I thought typing in "U.S." is not as convenient as "US". To be fair, I wonder how others feel about this. --George Ho (talk) 20:38, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose. See MOS:ABBR. "U.S." is not at all analogous with "UK". In American English, which this article is obviously written in, it is acceptable to use either "US" or "U.S.", as long as it is done consistently. Personally, I prefer "US" (and so does CMoS), but our current practice is not to change between the two unless there is a very compelling reason (similar to ENGVAR) and I do not see one in this case. Lastly, why have you piped links to WP:IAR and WP:CONSENSUS? They have nothing to do with what you've written. Jenks24 (talk) 20:49, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I piped WP:IAR because WP:article titles is not the same as WP:MOSABBR, mainly used for body editing, not title editing. I don't see anything in WP:MOSABBR related to naming conventions of titles. WP:article titles could favor either titles, but I don't see punctuation-related in that policy ; the abbreviation guideline doesn't mention how titles must be . Also, I've re-edited piping of and piped WP:Consensus in sentences because I invite consensus to see this and would like others to read more about them. --George Ho (talk) 20:58, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 * If you don't think the MoS applies, then surely it doesn't need to be IAR'd anyway? Your consensus link does make more sense now, though. Of course the MoS applies to titles – it would be absurd to use "U.S." in the body, but "US" in the title (or vice versa). As a more concrete example, MOS:DASH does not explicitly mention article titles, yet it is regularly used as a rationale to move (or not move) articles. Jenks24 (talk) 21:06, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Oops... Found this: WP:MOSABBR. I guess I didn't see that. Still, that guideline doesn't imply that one or the other be favored or opposed. It says: either this (or that). Favorism or opposition of punctuations on abbreviations as disambiguators is not suggested there. --George Ho (talk) 21:12, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's what I've been saying. Either is acceptable and we just stick with whatever the original editor chose. Jenks24 (talk) 21:20, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose:"U.S." with periods is used on other game show articles including The Price Is Right, Sale of the Century, Who Wants to Be a Millionaire, and Wheel of Fortune. JTRH (talk) 21:27, 18 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Support. In an international encyclopedia such as Wikipedia we try for commonality (see WP:COMMONALITY, part of WP:MOS). The modern tendency is to avoid the use of periods in such abbreviations as "UK" and "US". Even the hugely dominant US style guide Chicago Manual of Style now recommends "US". From the current edition, CMOS16 (my underlining):
 * "10.4 Periods with abbreviations In using periods with abbreviations, Chicago recommends the following general guidelines in nontechnical settings. For the use of space between elements ... ... 3. Use no periods with abbreviations that appear in full capitals, whether two letters or more and even if lowercase letters appear within the abbreviation: VP, CEO, MA, MD, PhD, UK, US, NY, IL (but see rule 4). 4. In publications using traditional state abbreviations, use periods to abbreviate United States and its states and territories: U.S., N.Y., Ill. Note, however, that Chicago recommends using the two-letter postal codes (and therefore US) wherever abbreviations are used ; see 10.28. ..."
 * See also the abbreviations section in WP:MOS, which makes specific mention of the provincial usage "U.S." in the US. Given the problem of parallel articles like Wheel of Fortune (US game show) and Wheel of Fortune (UK game show), it would serve the interests of the encyclopedia and its readership if we could break free of it. The firmly applied principle of uniformity within an article gives no support for lack of uniformity between articles.
 * N oetica Tea? 01:55, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, I noted in my oppose that CMoS has flipped its position in the latest edition. It's worth noting that since the latest edition of CMoS there have been discussions at WT:MOS about deprecating "U.S.", but the consensus has always been that either is acceptable. Your COMMONALITY point is reasonable, but I would argue that it's more important for this article to be in line with other members of, say, Category:American game shows, than with British shows that are based on the American one. Jenks24 (talk) 15:11, 19 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Support - Agree with the concerns by Noetica and George Ho, we must avoid abbreviations for U.S. and we strive for commonality. Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:12, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * You mean "punctuations", not "abbreviations"? --George Ho (talk) 02:22, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Jenks24 and JTRH. Steam5 (talk) 07:56, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: WP policy also allows for use of national variations according to subject, e.g., articles about the United States are generally written in the style of United States English and articles about the United Kingdom are generally written in the style of British English. If "U.S." with periods is the dominant self-referent usage in the United States (as the MOS states that it is) and "UK" without periods is the dominant self-referent usage in the United Kingdom, there's no reason not to use each as appropriate. Striving for "commonality" may actually introduce inaccuracy - a pet peeve of mine, for example, is that the infobox templates for game shows require the use of UK-English credit terms of "presenter" and "narrator" when the terms used in the United States are "host" and "announcer." Calling Drew Carey the "presenter" of The Price Is Right is inaccurate. He's not the "presenter," he's the "host." But "commonality" means he must be inaccurately referred to by the term that's used on British television? National variations exist and accuracy requires them to be portrayed here. JTRH (talk) 14:47, 19 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Oppose, based on conventions following national varieties of English. The periods are the dominant form in the United States. There is no need to create consistency where it does not exist. The same rationale goes for changing "UK" to "U.K.", which exists in numerous American print sources.--Jiang (talk) 22:34, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose WP:ENGVAR, and American English has not become as lax as British English in the degeneration of usage of fullstops. (though the lack of spaces between the fullstop and the next letter has become common) 70.49.124.147 (talk) 04:23, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose per WP:ENGVAR and because "US" looks like an English word in all-caps rather than an abbreviation. There's a reason Brits moved to "UK" more readily... because their period-less abbreviation is unambiguous.  Powers T 02:58, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Duplication/triplication
Some of the information in this article is given two or three times, including the dates of the network runs and personnel changes. It needs a major copy edit which I don't have time to do right now. JTRH (talk) 10:11, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Most of the repetition I see is just the intro repeating what's found in the article. Which is how it's supposed to be. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:18, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: No consensus Orlady (talk) 23:53, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Wheel of Fortune (U.S. game show) → Wheel of Fortune (game show) – Okay, I will concede a.) that CBS had an unrelated game show in 1952 also called Wheel of Fortune, and b.) the US is not the only country whose version of the famous hangman/roulette game is called Wheel of Fortune.

However, in regards to Point A, a show that's been consistently on the air for 37 years and is still in first-run clearly gets priority over something that was only around for a few months in TV's infancy. In regards to Point B, all of the international versions are derivations of the American version. Would it not make sense that the original, American verison be at just "(game show)" since all other shows bearing that title (save for the 1952 CBS show) are derivations of the American version? This seems like a pretty clear cut WP:PRIMARYTOPIC to me. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:46, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Support - It would make sense that the title will just have "game show", and I feel that this is a primary topic as well. Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 21:48, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Support - I would say that a 37 year run for a show compared to clones and shorter run precursor might be Primary Topic!--Education does not equal common sense. 我不在乎  02:48, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose; I believe that current consensus practice is to consider primacy only in regards to the base name. When a name is disambiguated, it must be fully disambiguated.  That said, I would support a proposal to move this article to the base name on primary topic grounds.  The only competitive topic is Rota Fortunae, and I think a direct hatnote link will be more than sufficient to accommodate that use.  Powers T 18:45, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Just in response to "When a name is disambiguated, it must be fully disambiguated", that used to be my understanding, but the last time I asked about it (Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation/Archive 35) most people who commented thought that it was OK to have "primary topics" for disambiguations. For example, we have Thriller (album) despite the existence of several other album articles titled "Thriller". Jenks24 (talk) 08:42, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Support, although I like Powers's suggestion even better. The title could do without disambiguation, though simplifying its disambiguation is a step in the right direction. --BDD (talk) 18:15, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose if it is to be disambiguated, it should be fully disambiguous. -- 76.65.131.160 (talk) 05:31, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose. There are so many other international versions of the game show Wheel of Fortune. Should the disambiguation page, has UK, New Zealand, Phillipines. Don't see why this is more important that the others. TBrandley 16:44, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * There should be an article for the entire franchise (Wheel of Fortune (TV series) or Wheel of Fortune (franchise)) and separate articles for each of the national variations. Similar to what was done with Idol (TV series), Pop Idol, and American Idol.--SGCM (talk)  18:11, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't think that "Idol" is a valid comparison, as each version has a distinct name already. --Education does not equal common sense. 我不在乎  18:15, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? follows a similar format and may be a better example. There's Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? for the entire franchise, Who Wants to Be a Millionaire (U.S. game show), Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? (UK game show), and Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? (Australian game show).--SGCM (talk)  18:18, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

37 years but 30th anniversary?
They don't acknowledge the Chuck Woolery years? Bizzybody (talk) 00:43, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The current version of the show doesn't count the daytime version as part of its history. The nighttime show is in its 30th season. JTRH (talk) 01:13, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

picture of set
The picture of the set is really outdated, could someone possibly find a picture of the current set.207.224.196.27 (talk) 03:08, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Good Grief thousands of characters about such trivial crap — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.225.200.133 (talk) 19:32, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Citation needed tag
Re: the citation needed tag added yesterday with the edit summary "a GA with unsourced parts?": my understanding per WP:GAC? is that the only statements requiring inline citation are "direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons". WP:GACN goes to to specify, "Inline citations are not decorative elements, and GA does not have any "one citation per sentence" or "one citation per paragraph" rules." I won't revert the tag that's in place, but thought I'd explain my own reasoning. I'll leave it to the regular editors of the article from here. Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 10:52, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

How do we watch the show?
P — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.223.230.131 (talk) 02:14, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Wheeloffortune.com has a section where you can enter your zip code and find the nearest network that airs it. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:53, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

30th anniversary logo
The file in the infobox is outdated the current season is no longer WOF's 30th year. Tom the Bergeron (talk) 20:15, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Wheel of fortune countries.PNG
This graph is very outdated and should be updated or removed. For starters, the German franchise version ceased already in 2002 (and a last low budget revival finally in 2005). 93.197.8.176 (talk) 20:42, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on Wheel of Fortune (U.S. game show)
Cyberbot II has detected links on Wheel of Fortune (U.S. game show) which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:


 * http://www.vegasslotsonline.com/igt/wheel-of-fortune/
 * Triggered by  on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 17:15, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Incomplete history of gameplay
One thing missing from this is "Why R, S, T, L, N, and E?" a question answered on several Yahoo! Answers pages and similar sources, like Quora. A systematic listing of gameplay changes and the reason behind them is at http://wheeloffortunehistory.wikia.com/wiki/Gameplay_elements. However, since none of these are "reliable sources," they are not included here. Unfortunately, finding a "reliable" history of something as trivial as a game show is a bit difficult. Any thoughts? Calbaer (talk) 17:40, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Per our verifiability and reliable sources policies, all content must be verified against a reliable source. As you may know, Wikia's wikis are not reliable sources for citation of information incorporated into Wikipedia articles. But then again, I must remind you there are a LOT of minutae of Wheel of Fortune that are ineligible for inclusion in Wikipedia, including but not limited to the following:
 * Memorable moments in individual episodes
 * What stations air Wheel in what markets, and whether the show precedes or follows Jeopardy! in a given market
 * The status of individual episodes, and when the wiping of episodes was stopped
 * References to the show in popular culture (except maybe the reference to it in Billy Joel's song "We Didn't Start the Fire", provided the sourcing is reliable)
 * A list of theme weeks and when the show began to employ them (not only original research, but also in violation of Manual of Style guidelines discouraging list incorporation)
 * A list of all contestants who have won or lost $100,000 or $1,000,000 prizes in the Bonus Round (same reasoning as above)
 * Records of highest and lowest scores among contestants, or of Jackpot or 1/2 Car Wedge wins (not only original research, but also means incorporating unnecessary tables)
 * A gallery of non-free images depicting dresses worn by White in memorable episodes (violates WP:NOTGALLERY and also more than violates our non-free content criteria)
 * Description of the show's logo design, graphics packages, and typography
 * Which of the interim announcers between O'Donnell's death and Thornton's hiring announced in what episodes
 * The structure of the main theme tunes, the arrangement history of "Changing Keys", what specific prizes used which cues, description of the show's sound effects and the upgrade to them, and the famous chanting of the show's title at the beginning of the program
 * Descriptions of the individual iterations of the show's set throughout its history
 * Special camera shots, like the old "logo on overhead Wheel shot" opening and the chroma-key closing
 * Many retired gameplay elements, including the Surprise wedge, Double Play, null cycles (i.e., the host hitting Bankrupt or Lose a Turn on the final spin), etc.
 * Listing of the show's categories and their usage histories
 * Records of main games, toss-ups, bonus rounds, and their outcomes
 * Records of puzzle usage history, misspellings, and distribution of categories among episodes
 * Unless otherwise specified, all of the above information is ineligible for inclusion in Wikipedia because it is: a) too trivial or crufty, b) original research, or c) unnecessary. This is an encyclopedia ― not a fansite or a dumping ground for fancruft, original research, or unnecessary trivia. --SethAllen623 (discussion/contributions), October 22, 2015, 17:35 UTC.

Why do I need a source!?
Jeopardy and Wheel of Fortune began stereo broadcasting in 1984! ACMEWikiNet (talk) 19:51, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Can you prove it? 206.74.211.95 (talk) 20:05, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I can't prove it. Stereo broadcasting was introduced in 1984. So, I say we use Stereo for (Syn/CBS). Mono for NBC versions. ACMEWikiNet (talk) 20:12, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
 * How do you know that stereo broadcasting was introduced in 1984, much less that the show adopted it then? If you can't source it, it's just an opinion which doesn't belong in an encyclopedia article. And you're being so persistent in this that you're skating pretty close to another block. 67.197.213.222 (talk) 01:21, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
 * There are zero sources that say that Wheel of Fortune is in Stereo! Can we please revise the infobox and make sure it is 100% source? ACMEWikiNet (talk) 16:17, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Wheel of Fortune (U.S. game show). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713152856/http://www.cbstelevisioncity.com/shows to http://www.cbstelevisioncity.com/shows%23
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131110003838/http://tele.premiere.fr/La-Roue-de-la-fortune-1875286 to http://tele.premiere.fr/La-Roue-de-la-fortune-1875286

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Number of episodes
Stop changing the episode count in the infobox without providing an updated reference. The tagged reference states 6,000 episodes. AldezD (talk) 15:21, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

See also section
I didn't realize there were other things also called "wheel of fortune", such as the Big Six wheel or the Wheel of Fortune (Tarot card) or Rota Fortunae. I thought these would be worth a link, but when I added Wheel of Fortune (disambiguation) that got reverted by User:AldezD. If any of these are the source of the name, they'd probably be worth a direct mention; otherwise, maybe "See also" links? -- Beland (talk) 17:53, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * @User:Beland, please review MOS:SEEALSO for guidance. MOS states section purpose is to link to articles "indirectly related to the topic" or "to enable readers to explore tangentially related topics" and that "The 'See also' section should not link…to disambiguation pages". AldezD (talk) 18:16, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * @User:Beland, please stop creating a See also section and adding disambiguation links or links to other articles using the phrase "wheel of fortune" that are not indirectly nor tangentially related to the topic of this page, the game show Wheel of Fortune. That is not the purpose of a See also section per the MOS linked above. AldezD (talk) 01:29, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I put those three items in a "See also" section because I think they are tangentially related to the game show, in that they both share the same name and the concept of gaining or losing money. I'm actually wondering if Big Six wheel is the direct inspiration for the name of the show, but the fact that these three things existed before the show I think is interesting in that the idea didn't just come out of the blue. What do other editors think? -- Beland (talk) 01:43, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * —A tarot card has nothing to do with a game show. The same goes for a medieval symbol. The Big Six wheel is not specifically mentioned in #Conception and development, but again, the gambling game associated with the Big Six wheel is not tangentially nor indirectly related to this game show. These items merely share the same name "wheel of fortune". The disambiguation page Wheel of Fortune adequately address these unrelated articles. AldezD (talk) 01:50, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I could see an argument for the tarot card that happen to have the same name and shares a more tenuous connection (but to me that's still an interesting connection.) Big six wheel shares a common game mechanic, though the wheel matches dice rather than assigning monetary value to letter guesses. The disambiguation page isn't linked from this article, so I don't see how it helps readers of this article learn about those things if they've arrived here from a search engine. -- Beland (talk) 02:01, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * —Template:About addresses your argument. Add it as a hatnote to article if you'd like. AldezD (talk) 02:38, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * That seems more appropriate for people who have arrived at the wrong article, rather than people who are merely interested in learning about tangentially related topics. -- Beland (talk) 02:40, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * —Tarot cards and medieval symbols aren't tangentially related to a television game show. AldezD (talk) 03:11, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Since we disagree on that point, I'm curious what other editors think. -- Beland (talk) 03:12, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Third opinion request
A WP:3O request has been created for the above dispute. AldezD (talk) 03:22, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Current information
This article makes no sense. Obviously Pat Sajak has been the host of what people know as the Wheel of Fortune for a very long time. If I were an alien I would have no idea of that reading this article. This makes it sound like he quit as the host in the 1980s. The caption for one of the pictures even says Sajak and White have hosted the syndicated version since 1983 yet there is no link to a page for the syndicated version. Which makes no sense because nobody give a sh** about any version of Wheel of Fortune that doesn't have Pat Sajak and Vanna White hosting it. So if the one currently airing is technically the syndicated one then this article should be ABOUT the syndicated show with whatever came on before being relegated to a footnote. Honestly, I think this is vandalism. Will somebody please fix this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.230.1.159 (talk) 04:49, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * This is hardly vandalism. The network daytime version (1975-1991) used to be the subject of a separate article which was merged into this one. Sajak left the daytime show in 1989 but has been on the nighttime version throughout its run. Yes, the current show is the syndicated one, as is made clear within the first few sentences of the article, and the overwhelming majority of the information in the article is about the current version. 32.179.50.207 (talk) 10:29, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

The show is still on the air. Need current host information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.109.56.32 (talk) 00:19, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * What do you mean? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:04, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I confirm this confusion. The sidebar with all the host and producer information only gives host information for the network daytime show, which ended in '91.  I came looking for a quick list of hosts and became half-convinced that the show had been only showing reruns since '91.  Fortunately, I came to my senses, but had to dig into the article for information that is misleadingly missing from the sidebar. LordQwert (talk) 00:38, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The "Presented by" section is broken out into two sub-sections: Network and Syndicated, both in bold font, listing the on-air personalities associated with each version of the program. The section is not misleading nor is it incomplete. AldezD (talk) 01:11, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * There is no separate syndicated section. It's confusing as can be. 2600:8805:5800:F500:A8CF:29D7:88F5:2A92 (talk) 23:19, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Then what's this right here? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:21, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Wheel of Fortune (1952) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:02, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Erased or destroyed episodes.
I think some mention should be made about nearly all of Chuck Woolery's episodes having been erased or destroyed by NBC. That was an odd thing to do since TV networks around the world had mostly stopped erasing tapes for re-use by the mid 70's due to the falling cost of video tape and the potential of making more money from repeat broadcasts and other uses of archived shows. Bizzybody (talk) 12:38, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I have heard this, but I have no idea how it could be verified. JTRH (talk) 15:18, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Covid 19 Pandemic
Does anyone think there should be something added about the show currently not being produced due to the Pandemic? I think it has to do with production and would be a good addition to the article. Wjrz nj forecast (talk) 21:58, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * @User talk:Wjrz nj forecast you should be not adding unsourced content. AldezD (talk) 22:15, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
 * @ AldezD, I do not need a source to add to the talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wjrz nj forecast (talk • contribs) 22:51, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:24, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * LATE SEASON 36 ROUND 1.png

Celebrity Wheel of Fortune
Should information about the new series Celebrity Wheel of Fortune added somewhere on this article? Cwater1 (talk) 02:00, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
 * It's already mentioned. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:12, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Controversies
Strange that this article doesn't have a § Controversies, nor does it appear to mention the rules regarding pronunciation. Television contestants have lost when they solved the puzzle, clearly and distinctly, but the judges disallowed it because they spoke with a regional accent which differs from the game's accepted pronunciation. Apparently Wheel of Fortune received public backlash from it, and the amount of money that the contestants would have otherwise received was substantial. But a quick word search in this article for 'accent' or 'pronunciation' returns 0 matches. The article shouldn't cite YouTube clips due to content ownership, but there should be enough material available for an section in the article. &#8212;&#160;CJDOS,&#160;Sheridan,&#160;OR&#160;(talk) 02:00, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * You might first look for YouTube clips, and then see if you can find corresponding news articles. One controversy that comes to mind is when they have one of those lists of 4 things and people have gotten dinged for throwing an "and" into the list, which the fans said is idiotic. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 01:49, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Comments by fans do not have an impact to the rules of the game. Please do not link YouTube videos as references that do not align with WP:YT. AldezD (talk) 12:58, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Not as references, but as guidelines for further research. Some incidents, such as the one I mentioned, have been well-covered and should be easy to find valid sourcing for. Although, in the case of a game show, "controversies" might be overstating things. It's just a bloody game show, not world-shattering news! ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 18:24, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Crossword Example is not possible
The example given for the crossword puzzle is not possible (Game Play, last sentence in the first paragraph). Does any picture or video of this episode exist? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.75.74.21 (talk) 00:04, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Status of Chuck Woolery hosted episodes
Does anyone know for sure what the status is of the episodes hosted by Chuck Woolery from 1975-1981? I have heard rumors they were wiped on the order of Merv Griffin himself after Woolery's salary negotiations went sour, but not anything definitive. --Shawn K. Quinn (talk) 16:45, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't think anything's verifiable. NBC apparently routinely wiped just about everything prior to the late 70s. JTRH (talk) 20:49, 20 August 2022 (UTC)