Talk:When We Are in Need/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator:

Reviewer: Skyshifter (talk · contribs) 13:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Looking forward to that season 1 good topic! Skyshifter  talk  13:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

General comments

 * The infobox image has a valid fair use rationale. The other images have valid free use licenses for Commons.
 * No copyvio

Prose

 * Infobox, lead, plot, and conception and writing are fine.

Casting and characters

 * -> feel like it should be "would"
 * feels a bit redundant with the previous . Could remove the former sentence or merge these two sentences together.
 * While the way it is written can suggest Shepherd was casted to interpret David, this is never directly mentioned, and it slighly confused me when reading for the first time (probably for being a non-native speaker though). Either way, I'd suggest changing it to something like
 * I'd suggest adding the year here, as the previous mention of the year was two paragraphs ago.

Filming

 * mention the town is in Canada, or at least Alberta
 * I just noticed the lead said the episode was recorded in Calgary, Alberta; I've changed it.
 * I think semicolons are used too much in this section. I'd recommend rephrasing some sentences (some semicolons can also just be replaced by a dot).
 * I think semicolons are used too much in this section. I'd recommend rephrasing some sentences (some semicolons can also just be replaced by a dot).

Reception

 * Broadcast and ratings is fine
 * I think "noted" is commonly used for facts, but the quote is subjective. I'd recommend going with the usual "reads".
 * -> ; "the" is needed in this sentence
 * Would recommend expanding or attributing the sentence

Sources + spot-check

 * All sources seem to be correctly formatted and reliable, and the usage of primary sources is valid here.
 * Numbers based on this revision


 * 1: did a small edit
 * 2:
 * 3:
 * 10:
 * 17:
 * 21:
 * 35:
 * 42: I don't think this confirms the episode was rushed. The review says that there are "pieces missing" and similar, but doesn't say the episode is "rushed", "fast-paced" or anything similar — in fact, the reviewer says "it's got a good pace". "Streamlining", apparently (again, not a native speaker), doesn't necessarily mean "fast" etc. I believe this should be removed from "Several critics considered the episode rushed", unless I missed something.

I saw everything was applied correctly so far; will pass after the above comment is responded to. Skyshifter  talk  00:25, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review! Good catch—I've removed the ref from that particular sentence. Please let me know if there's anything else. – Rhain  ☔ (he/him) 00:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
 * ✅ Congratulations! Skyshifter   talk  00:32, 23 March 2024 (UTC)