Talk:Where Are They Now? (Australian TV program)

Requested move 11 August 2016

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: First and third pages moved to Where Are They Now? (Australian TV program) and Where Are They Now? (U.S. TV series) with rough consensus. Consider a separate RM for the second if the title is sub-optimal, but the consensus is not clear I think. (non-admin closure) — Andy W.  ( talk  · ctb) 20:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

– 1) The Australian show also has a question mark in its title per reference on its page. 2) I think the Australian show and the American show are non-episodic and thus should be titled "program" rather than "series" per WP:NC-TV. 3) The Hong Kong show appears to be the only talk show with this title, and we typically don't use network as a disambiguator, but even if we use "TVB" it should be WHere Are They Now? (TVB TV programme) per WP:NC-TV. 4) "VH1" should be changed to "U.S." for the same reason. Timmyshin (talk) 21:10, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Where Are They Now (TV series) → Where Are They Now? (Australian TV program)
 * Where Are They Now? (TVB) → Where Are They Now? (talk show)
 * Where Are They Now? (VH1 TV series) → Where Are They Now? (U.S. TV program)
 * Support per nom. Makes sense. As an Australian I can confirm for you the Australian show is indeed non-episodic so program is appropriate over series. -- Whats new?(talk) 23:22, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Partial support – I support the first proposal, as per nom. But Where Are They Now? (TVB) → Where Are They Now? (Hong Kong TV series) is preferable in lieu of the second proposal, and the third should definitely be Where Are They Now? (U.S. TV series) – we simply don't use the word "program" as a disambiguator for U.S. TV shows (e.g. WP:NCTVUS), and in fact I strongly oppose the current third proposal. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:23, 13 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.