Talk:Where Reincarnation and Biology Intersect

Restoring with new, improved version
This article now lists some impressive sources, which include: -- Johnfos (talk) 22:21, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * American Journal of Psychiatry, the official journal of the American Psychiatric Association, see
 * Anthropology of Consciousness a Wiley-Blackwell journal, see
 * British Medical Journal, see
 * EXPLORE: The Journal of Science and Healing a journal from Elsevier, the world's largest publisher of medical and scientific literature, see [
 * Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science a Springer journal, which is abstracted/Indexed in: Academic Search, Current Abstracts, Google Scholar, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, Journal Citation Reports/Social Sciences Edition, Neuroscience Citation Index, OCLC, PsycINFO, PubMed/Medline, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), SCOPUS, Social Science Citation Index, Social SciSearch, Summon by Serial Solutions, and TOC Premier. See
 * 1, Referenced in review of different book in book forum, 2, Search of that site yields no results, 3, Search of that site yields no results, 4, Not a WP:RS and notability of publisher is irrelevant, 5, Search of that site yields no results. Taken as a whole these are less than impressive. Verbal chat  09:55, 6 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Instead of searching for the material yourself and not being able to find it, next time please ask John to reproduce it here, or give you a link. Obviously he is not making this up, so you must not have looked in the right places. Mitsube (talk) 04:46, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

New version
I don't know what he merits of Verbal's claims above are, but it is certainly true that the fact claims of the current article are thoroughly referenced to reliable sourced, and there are many instances of the book being discussed in notable publications. I am restoring it. Mitsube (talk) 04:09, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Verbal, please explain why you performed the delete by redirect of the new version of the article . Mitsube (talk) 04:13, 21 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I agree with this change. --EPadmirateur (talk) 13:43, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Agree with Johfos, Mitsube and EPadmirateur that this article should not be deleted and the title redirected, except by consensus. This book is by a notable, (albeit controversial) author and is sourced. Verbal appears to disagree and is edit waring to assert his point of view. Let's cease the edit waring and look at evidence and sources. Verbal, would you be able to present your point of view now? Sunray (talk) 05:59, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Agree, article clearly meets WP:NBOOK due to multiple reviews. Yworo (talk) 17:56, 3 September 2010 (UTC)