Talk:White-eyed river martin/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rt

Successful good article nomination
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of January 4, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?: Check
 * 2. Factually accurate?: Check
 * 3. Broad in coverage?: Check
 * 4. Neutral point of view?: Check
 * 5. Article stability? Check
 * 6. Images?: Check

Well written. Nothing to say, quite excellent in my opinion. :) If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.  Rt
 * Many thanks  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:13, 30 November 2009 (UTC)