Talk:White-fronted falconet/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Amitchell125 (talk · contribs) 09:29, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Happy to review the article.

Lead section/infobox

 * Does CITES need to be linked twice in the infobox?
 * That's how the template is formatted, can't do anything about that.
 * Understood. AM


 * I have produced a larger-scale map, which can be amended in any way. i would consider replacing the current one 9which provides little information) with this one, (which provides a little more).
 * Done.

1 Taxonomy and systematics

 * Introduce Carole Griffiths, perhaps by saying where her team were based.
 * I guess NYC, but not really relevant, is it? I don't really think an introduction can be added, since unlike Sharpe, Griffiths isn't independently notable and I'm just mentioning her because she's the lead author.
 * Just checking, but is are further sister grammatically correct here?
 * Yes.

2 Description

 * extremely (or perhaps even extremely small) is vague, and seems unnecessary here, given that the measurements are provided.
 * Provides a description in case somebody doesn't know how large a falcon usually is and thus has nothing to compare the given length with.
 * by a small amount – providing an actual comparison with another species would help this phrase sound less vague.
 * Source only says "albeit marginally the smallest"
 * also 9 per cent larger - ‘9 per cent larger’?
 * I don't see the issue here, do you want % signs instead of the word?

2.1 Vocalisations

 * I would put all of the text in this small sub-section into the Description section (see MOS:LINEBREAKS).
 * Done.

3 Distribution and habitat

 * but is found is redundant imo.
 * Reworded.

4 Behaviour and ecology

 * Consider swapping The white-fronted falconet in the second paragraph with The species in the first, to improve the prose slightly.
 * Done.
 * Link preening.
 * Done.

On hold
Most minor issues, easily sorted. I'm putting this interesting little article on hold for a week until 4 September to allow time for the issues raised to be addressed. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 14:33, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I've replied to all the things you pointed out. AryKun (talk) 14:52, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Passing now. Amitchell125 (talk) 15:21, 1 September 2022 (UTC)